|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
[Photo: Phujatkan] The link above is actually the Phujatkan Thai Language transcript's of the Terrible Torpedo's tweeter-shattering tirade. See extracts in English and MP3 download below:Quote:
Last edited by GWR; 24-07-08 at 11:02 AM.. |
|
Sponsors |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by GWR; 24-07-08 at 07:24 PM.. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() http://nationmultimedia.com/2008/07/...n_30078823.php Last edited by GWR; 24-07-08 at 10:37 PM.. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This attitude have Splitted Octoberists into 2 major factions - the first ones who are not anti Monarchy and the second one - the Anti Monarchy faction |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clarification
Quote:
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thaksin - lese majeste transgression?
I wonder if Pojaman’s Khunying-ship can, be revoked now that she is a convicted felon (subject to appeal, I suppose). And, even further, it seems to me that she and her hubby have transgressed the lese majeste laws by misrepresenting her deeds (or, more specifically, failing to disclose her mis-deeds) thereby leading HM into the embarrassment of granting her the title when she would likely not be qualified otherwise. I think such laws are actually an abysmal anachronism but, hey, since Thaksin and his allies have used the laws against others, why not? Does anyone out there know whether precedent exists?
B. Clendenin |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
During the WWII, there was an Air Marshall who DID involved in the corruption - After the Military Tribunal had delivered the vindict, his "Air Marshall" alogn with his title [AthuekThewadej] had been REMOVED. This has sent the precendant that after the final judgement from Supreme Court or the Highest Court for the case of War Time had been delivered, the title of such convict will be removed ... |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Basis for lese majeste
Thanks for your information, Khun Wisarut. How about the lese majeste aspect? Do you think Thaksin / Pojaman could be charged with violating those laws? If so, is it very likely? If Pojaman conviction is affirmed by the higher Court, surely an argument could be made that Thaksin / Pojaman have committed a fraud against the throne.
|
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Sponsors |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nowm, Manager Daily has pointed out that UDD men jsut abandoned Ee Dah Torpido in jail sicne the attept to abil her out fro this kind of crime would eebventual push thsoe UDD men alogn with those left wing intellectuals into Prison cells ... until they have been pardoned by His Majesty ... but may have the annitional crimes attached with them .... the come of attept to change the system to republican/communist regime ... the sure shortcut to lethal injection ....
If there is no additional crime attached, the court procedure on this les majeste case would take virtually FOREVER that it could turn Ee Dah into a real prison shipwreck ... http://www.manager.co.th/Politics/Vi...=9510000096833 |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sondhi Limthongkul Attackign Tej Boonna for being too soft on Ai Maew - MFB better confisticate any excisitng passports of Ai Maew and Ee photjamarn sothey can be extradiated abck to Thailand to confrotn with the judges at Supreme COurt ...
http://www.manager.co.th/Politics/Vi...=9510000098640 |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thaksin diplomatic passport irregular
I agree with Khun Sondhi / PAD on the point of Thaksin's diplomatic passport.
Of course, the decision of who receives the several classes of passports is always the prerogative of the issuing government. But the Thai government's decision to grant a diplomatic passport to Thaksin is an affront to the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Thailand ratified the Convention in 1985. The Vienna Convention presumes that persons holding diplomatic passports are performing some representational service for the issuing government. I'm not aware that Thaksin has performed any service for the government since the 2006 coup. Yet, by holding a diplomatic passport he has many extraordinary privileges that only facilitate his ability to operate, move money, create further mischief, etc. Tej Bunnag is an experienced diplomat who presumably understands the intent, purposes and ramifications of the Vienna Convention. Allowing Thaksin and his family (and perhaps his accompanying staff also) to have diplomatic passports is irregular at best. Sondhi's questions regarding the Thaksin passport are most certainly appropriate. There are other related issues which I'll attempt to address in a subsequent post. Bernie Last edited by Bernie; 21-08-08 at 09:28 PM.. Reason: typo error |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|